| > Home |
> Welcome (Dr. Heichel) |
> Welcome (Robert Dunker) |
> Field Presentations |
> Tent Exhibits |
> Credits & Thanks |
> Sponsors |
![]() |
Bill Simmons Associate Professor Dept. of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences (217) 333-9649; fsimmons@illinois.edu |
![]() |
|
| Loyd Wax Professor Department of Crop Sciences, USDA/ARS (217) 333-4424; l-wax@illinois.edu |
|||
Soil-applied herbicides and postemergence herbicides with soil activity are important parts of many weed control programs. Glyphosate-tolerant soybean cultivars have allowed for successful weed control with the use of various glyphosate products, often with no help from other herbicides. Soil-active herbicides may be a valuable tool for delaying the application of glyphosate until closer to canopy closure or for reducing weed emergence following a glyphosate application.
Two current topics of study are:
the use of soil-applied herbicides in a fall application to reduce the growth of winter annuals preceding no-till corn and soybean planting, and

Studies assessing application timing of several soil-applied grass herbicides in corn show that each herbicide has an optimal range of application date. If producers elect to apply these herbicides more than 30 days in advance of planting, selection of herbicide and herbicide formulation become important.
Some fall-applied grass herbicides have shown effectiveness roughly equivalent to a 60-day early preplant application in northern Illinois. In central and southern Illinois, application closer to planting usually is a better practice.

Recent warm winter seasons combined with wet springs have confronted no-till producers with excessive weed biomass at planting time that may interfere with planting. Fall-applied herbicides to suppress the growth of winter annuals in both corn and soybean fields is being studied in southern Illinois.
Soil-applied herbicides remain a valuable tool in corn and soybean weed control. To achieve the maximum value of these herbicides, producers must optimize application timing and adjust practices to fit the weed spectrum, while minimizing the potential for adverse crop response.
Back to Agronomy Day 2000 Field Presentations Index